The Effect of Engagement in Social Networking Application on Iranian EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in English

Main Article Content

Shahram Alipour


Motivating EFL learners to communicate in English has been a long-lasting challenge for English language instructors.  Regardless of the different proficiency level in English, every learner is expected to be able to create even simple structures in the target language; however, the EFL learners are reluctant to communicate in English.  In fact, communicative competence and authentic use of English language are directly related to learners’ willingness to communicate. Nowadays, the social networking applications (for Smartphones or Personal Computers) have introduced potential and authentic exposure opportunity for every human in the world. Combining the social networking engagement with language learning context may provide this opportunity for learners to communicate more than before. Therefore, in order to study the impact of engagement in social networking applications on Iranian EFL Learners’ willingness to communicate in English, the present research has been initiated. The sample of the study included EFL learners (N = 21) participating in TOEFL preparation course. The experimental group of the study has joined the social networking group in Telegram to communicate in English out of the class. The pre-treatment and post-treatment survey design has been applied to compare the study groups WTC level before and after the treatment.  The findings of the study indicated the positive effect of engagement in social networking on WTC. It was concluded that there are some guidelines in order to apply social networking in English language instruction. The findings are significant and applicable for English language instructors to apply such methods.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Author Biography

Shahram Alipour, +989357417734

M.A. in ELT, English language teacher.

My area of interest:
1. Teaching Methods (e.g. cooperative learning method; my M.A. thesis,
several conference papers and published paper)
2. Lesson Study Program (Type of Peer Mentoring): (A paper is in
review in LTRQ (eurokd publication in which you are editorial board)
3. Textbook Evaluation (Conference paper in Urmia)
4. Technology in Language learning (e.g. social networking; a paper is
in review in LTRQ)
5. Teacher/student Motivation, students' WTC (a paper in review in LTRQ)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.