Main Article Content
The aim of this study was to determine the learning styles of prospective chemistry and science teachers and to examine the effect of different learning styles on their self-regulated learning skills. The survey method which is one of the quantitative research methods was used in this study. 251 prospective chemistry and science teachers from the Department of Chemistry and Science Education at different three public universities were participated in this study. In the study, the Self-Regulated Learning Skills Scale developed by Turan and Demirel (2010) was used to determine self-regulated learning skills of prospective teachers and “Maggie McVay Lynch Learning Style Inventory” developed by McVay Lynch (2004) and adapted into Turkish by Dağhan and Akkoyunlu (2011), was used to determine the prospective teachers’ learning styles as data collection tools. The results showed that 61.8 % of prospective chemistry and science teachers have visual learning style, followed by moving or kinesthetic learning style (19.9%) and auditory learning style (18.3%).and there was a statistically significant difference in prospective chemistry and science teachers’ lack of self-directedness scores according to their learning styles.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).