The attention of the new public service in implementation of local autonomy bureaucracy in Indonesia

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Dec 31, 2015
DOI https://doi.org/10.18844/gjs.v5i2.175

Main Article Content

T., T. Datu

Abstract

A principle of New Public Service in building performance is important in maintaining the efficiency, effectiveness and customer satisfaction. Paradigm of New Public Service as a public servant more prioritizes the interests of the public by improving the quality of service. Administrators who are responsible have to work to involve citizens in implementing programs to achieve general goals.

The economic crisis that hit Indonesia since 1997 until today shows that Indonesia does not have a solid foundation to be tough to face global changes. The Government has always had difficulty in reducing this nation to rise from adversity of economic, social, and politics. This misunderstanding increases uncertainty of economic, social, and politics, while the cost of providing government also increased.

Changes in Law No 5 in 1974 to Law No 32 in 2004 and Law No 25 in 1999 has not produced output that benefits society. In fact, there were impressed that the society is getting harder to obtain rights of public service. Moreover, if they are associated with the quality of government bureaucracy, the realization of local autonomy and rise of abuse of authority in government bureaucracy that estimated the systemic and even to the affected areas.

 

 Keywords: new public service, bureaucracy, local autonomy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol 5 No 2 (2015): November
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Albrow, M. (1996). Birokrasi. Terj. M. Rusli Karim. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Bertrand, J. (2004). Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

King, C. S., & Stivers, C. (1998). Government Is Us: Public Administration In An Anti-Government Era. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Davidson, J. S. (2005). 10 Decentralization and regional violence in the post-Suharto state1. Regionalism in Post-Suharto Indonesia, 4, 170.

David, O. (1996). Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government, (terjemahan) Michigan: East Lansing,

Denhardt, J., V., & Denhardt, R., B. (2007). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering by.—Expanded ed. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Kleden, I. (2003). Indonesia setelah lima tahun reformasi. Analisis CSIS. Tahun 32 (2):

Mifta, T. (1991). Perspektif Perilaku Birokrasi: Dimensi-dimensi Prima Ilmu Administrasi Negara Jilid II. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Pratikno (2005). Iniating Participatory Democracy in Indonesia: The Case of Surakarta Municipality. Dalam Asia Pacific Perspectif an Electronic Journal, 5(2), 59-66.

Santoso, P. B. (1993). Birokrasi pemerintah Orde Baru: perspektif kultural dan struktural. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Rondinelli, D. A., & Cheema, G. S. (1983). Implementing decentralization policies: an introduction. Dalam G. Shabbir Cheema and Dennis A. Rondinelli (Pnyt). Decentralization And Development: policy implementation in developing countries. London: Sage Publication.

Syaukani, H. R. (2000). Menatap Harapan Masa Depan Otonomi Daerah. Kaltim: Gerbang Dayaku.

Sidik, J. (2001). Otonomi Daerah: Perspektif Hubungan Internasional. Yogyakarta: BIGRAF Publishing.

Smith, B.C. (1985). Decentralization: the teritorial dimension of state. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Soenyono. (2001). Prospek Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Dalam Andi A. Mallarangeng, dkk. Otonomi Daerah: Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktis.Yogyakarta: BIGRAF Publishing.

Syukur, A. (1991). Budaya Birokrasi di Indonesia. Dalam Alfian dan Nazaruddin Sjamsudin (ed.). Profil Budaya Politik Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Tri, R. (2000). Desentralisasi dan Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah di Indonesia. Dalam Sidik Jatmika. Otonomi Daerah: Perspektif Hubungan Internasional. Yogyakarta: BIGRAF Publishing.

Wasistiono, S. (2005). Desentralisasi dan otonomi daerah masa reformasi (1999-2004). Dalam Anonimous. Pasang Surut Otonomi Daerah: Sketsa perjalanan 100 tahun. Hal. 155-196. Jakarta: Yayasan TIFA.